Having a hard time seeing it differently than this.
Man states he will not sleep with woman.
Man sleeps with woman.
Man and woman get married.
Man doesn't talk with woman.
Man doesn't talk with his child.
Woman suggests counselling.
Man doesn't talk in counselling.
Man and woman get divorced with a joint custody agreement, forcing man to talk.
Man changes conditions of their agreement without talking with woman.
Children try to talk with man.
Man doesn't talk with children.
Woman takes man to court and wins.
But man doesn't talk.
Woman tries to take man to court a second time.
Man doesn't talk.
Man tells lies.
Lies are believed and supported.
Recommendation is that the two of them get counselling so they can talk to each other better.
The man has an abusive past and continues to mentally and emotionally abuse his children and woman.
And the court is suggesting that woman go back to this abusive situation and try again to talk with man.
Why should man change when he hasn't talked all along and gotten what he wanted? Why should man change when he's being supported by the attorneys he's lied to and are stating he's done nothing wrong?
Why should we think anything will change if woman tries to talk with this man?
Why should I believe in our legal system?
Why should I believe in our country?
Why should I keep silent?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment